The Arbitration Association Foundation–International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), a prominent nonprofit entity distributing millions of dollars in grant funding, faced challenges in ensuring fairness and consistency in its evaluation processes. Stakeholders raised concerns about unclear benchmarks, inconsistent decision-making, and the lack of standardized criteria for grant assessments. These issues undermined transparency, accountability, and confidence in the integrity of the grant distribution process. ICDR also recognized a need to strengthen its hiring practices to ensure fairness and alignment with best-in-class nonprofit standards.
These challenges mirror broader sector concerns. Research shows that only 16% of smaller nonprofits conduct formal evaluations, compared with 69% of larger ones, revealing a significant gap in structured accountability. ICDR’s decision to pursue a standardized and equitable evaluation process placed it at the forefront of addressing sector-wide challenges.
CDG was engaged as an independent contractor to design a research-based strategy that would bring structure, transparency, and accountability to ICDR’s operations. The engagement began with a comprehensive assessment of benchmarking practices across the nonprofit sector, leading to a strategy report tailored to ICDR’s needs. CDG developed clear, data-driven benchmarks for grant evaluation, created a standardized framework for consistent decision-making, and integrated conflict resolution principles into the process design to mitigate disputes before they arose.
Recognizing that organizational culture is just as important as process, CDG also aligned its recommendations with industry best practices. In a 2023 survey, nearly 40% of nonprofits reported implementing cultural sensitivity training and strategies as key tools for retention and culture-building. In keeping with this trend, CDG emphasized inclusive practices and training within ICDR’s recommendations. To support long-term sustainability, CDG also proposed an improved hiring framework rooted in equity and transparency. Together, these solutions equipped ICDR with actionable recommendations to embed fairness and integrity across its grantmaking and internal practices.
Through CDG’s structured approach, ICDR successfully transitioned to a more transparent, equitable, and efficient grant evaluation system. The adoption of standardized benchmarks reduced ambiguity and perceptions of bias, while the integration of conflict resolution principles minimized disputes and created a fair, structured appeal process. Stakeholders gained greater trust in ICDR’s funding decisions, and internal staff had clearer tools for decision-making. In addition, the redesigned hiring practices provided ICDR with a stronger, more equitable framework for selecting qualified personnel.
By embedding more effective evaluation practices into both external grantmaking and internal operations, ICDR strengthened its reputation for accountability and positioned itself as a leader in ethical nonprofit funding practices. Just as sector data suggests, with bias and lack of formal evaluation processes eroding trust in funding, ICDR’s reforms provided a model for how nonprofits can use structured evaluation and conflict resolution to set a new standard for fairness, transparency, and impact.
This is the updated pages indicating our three main development focus areas and one additional page for the industries served.
We are dedicated to building inclusive workplaces where diversity is celebrated and equity is ensured.
Our focus is on optimizing the employee experience to enhance engagement and performance.
